Cesarean section in rural areas of Kasaï Oriental (DR Congo): Participation of indications in the monthly evolution of rates in Kasansa and Tshilenge
Keywords:
Caesarean section, participation, indications, evolutionAbstract
Cesarean section is recognized as an effective surgical intervention to reduce maternal and newborn mortality if performed in a timely manner for pregnant women who really need it. This study analyzed the contribution of indications to the monthly evolution of cesarean section rates in rural Kasai Oriental. This retrospective descriptive bi-center study focused on 434 cesarean sections performed in the Kasansa and Tshilenge General Reference Hospitals in 2015 and 2016. To compare the percentages, Chi-square was used, t-Student for the means in the two maternity hospitals and the percentage changes were calculated with the growth formula. Despite the inflationary trends observed during the year, all groups of cesarean section indications ended the year in decline. In 2015, 11±3 caesareans were recorded in Kasansa with an inflation of 220% for emergency caesareans. In Tshilenge, 6±3 caesareans were performed and 100% inflation for emergency caesareans. In 2016, on average, the Kasansa maternity unit performed 9±5 caesareans per month and in Tshilenge, 10±4 caesareans. Cautionary caesareans had an inflation of 169.1% in Kasansa, while in Tshilenge, it was the inflation of emergency caesareans with 100%. According to the different classes of indications, in 2015, the notable increases in caesareans were recorded for uterine rupture (150%), breech presentation (100%) and PROM (200%). In 2016, dystocic presentations increased cesarean sections (180%), scarred uterus (600%) and eclampsia (200%). The practice of cesarean sections has decreased in both structures in general. Certain indications have particularly contributed remarkably to the increase in cesarean sections. Proper monitoring of the pregnancy will avoid cesarean sections for indications of necessity considered abusive.
Downloads
References
Boisselier P., Moghioracos P., Marpeau L., Hajali, B. & Barrat J. (1987). Evolution dans les indications de césariennes de 1977 à 1983 : A proposde 18605 accouchements.Journal deGynécologie. Obstétrique Biologie Reproduction., 16, 251-60.
Ciraru-Vigneron, N., Guyen Tan Lung, R., Elhaik, S.&Barrier, J.(1985). Evolution des indications de la césarienne : Comparaison entre 1971-76 et1976-79 à la maternité de l’hôpital Louis- Mourrier.Journal de GynécologieObstétrique Biologie Reproduction,14, 375-384
Cisse C.T., Faye E.O., De Bernis L., Dujardin B.& Diadhiou F.(1998). Césariennes au Sénégal : couverture des besoins et qualité des services. Cahiers Santé, 8 (5), 369-77.
Cissé, C.T., Ngom, P.M., Guissé A., E.O. Faye & Moreau, J.C. (2004). Réflexions sur l’évolution des taux de césarienne en milieu africain : Exemple du CHU de Dakar entre 1992 et 2001. Gynécologie obstétrique, 32(3), 210- 217
Broche, D.E., Courtois, L., Maillet R..&Reithmuller D.(2008).Césarienne.EMC Obstétrique, 5-102-A-10
Ecker, J.L. & Frigoletto, F..D. (2007). Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus.N. Engl. J. Med.356 : 885-888
Fond européen de développement (FED) & Fond d’achat des services de santé (FASS) Kasaï Oriental (2014). Projet d’accélération des progrès vers les OMD 4 et 5 dans les zones de santé de Kasansa, Kabinda, Miabi, Makota et Tshilenge dans la province du Kasai Oriental, 335- 984
Hannah, M.E., Hannah, W.J., Hewson, S.A., Hodnett, E.D., Saigal, S., & Willan, A.R. (2000). Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet, 356(9239), 1375-1383
Kabongo, A.G., Bukasa, J.C., Banza, D.B., Kayembe, C., Mutombo, A., Wembonyama, S. & Losimba, J. (2017). Caesarean in rural environment of Eastern Kasai (R.D. Congo): Cover of the needs and quality of the services with Kasansa and Tshilenge.Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry; 6(5), 1157-1163
Kayem, G. (2009). Preterm premature rupture of membranes: Active or expectant management? Elsevier, 37(4), 334- 341.
Keita, N., F.D. Diallo, Gandaho &E..LenoD.W.A., (2014). La césarienne en Afrique : Exemple de la Guinée. Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français. 38e Journées nationales, Paris
Kinekinda, X., Mukuku, O., Chenge, F., Kakundji, P., Bunzulu, P., Kakoma, J.B.& Kizonde, J.(2017).Caesarean section in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo: Fréquency, indications and maternal and perinatal mortality.Pan Africa Medicine. 26(208): 27: 72.
Latifa LABIBE (2012). Evolution des indications de la césarienne à la maternité souissi entre 1986 et 2010 (à propos de 35830 cas). Thèse, Université Mohammed V. Rabat
Lydia, B. Comment calculer le pourcentage d’augmentation ou de diminution sur Excel ? http://www.votreassistante.net
Maillet, R., Schaal, J.P. & Sloukgi, J.C. (1991). Comment réduire les taux de césarienne en CHU. Révue française de Gynécologie Obstétrique, 86, 294-300.
Marc, H. (2007). Operative Delivery.. In: Alan HD, Lauren N, (eds). Current Obstetrics and Gynecological Diagnosis and Treatment.(10th ed.,pp. 469-476)New York:MC Graw Hill Publishers,.
Nwosu, C., Agumor, K., Aboyeji, A..P.& Ijaiya, M.A. (2004).Outcome of caesarean section in a sub-urban secondary health care facility in Nigeria. Nigeria Medicine Practice,46(4), 77-79.
Ouedraogo, C., Testa, J., Sondo, B.& Kone, B. (2001). Analyse des facteurs de risque de morbidité maternelle sévère à Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: application à la fiche de consultation prénatale. Médecine d’Afrique Noire.; 48 (10), 403-410.
Ouedraogo, C., Zoungrana, T., Dao, B., Dujardin, B., Ouedraogo, A., Thieba, B.&Kone, B.( 2001), La césarienne de qualité au Centre Hospitalier Yalgado Ouedragogo de Ouagadougou, Analyse des déterminants à propos de 478 cas colligés dans le service de gynécologie obstétrique. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 48 (11), 443- 451
Stanton, C .K., Sara, A. & Holtz S.A., (2006). Levels and Trends in CesareaANSn Birth in the Developing World. Stu Fam Plan. 37(1), 41- 48.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-09-08 (2)
- 2018-04-12 (1)
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license term